This response about SBF has nothing to do with the proof about Samourai's deceptive practices against the Bitcoin community.
It has to do with prioritizing ethics on top of the protocol. You would deny SBF's coins, because you find it so morally unacceptable to have him conceal his activity, that you'd give up Bitcoin principles to have him censored.
It's a good analogy, because you carry the same shitty principles in real life. The moment someone did something you disapproved of in Twitter, you publicly doxxed them. You could have respected their right to privacy (as pro-privacy you call yourselves), but you chose revenge.
The WabiSabi coinjoin protocol has nothing to do with "outright lies"
Same strawman. Avoiding the essence, and repeating horseshit.
