Graham Potter is still without club now. I thought he shouldn't have been signed by Chelsea in the first place as I saw it as a risk. Because Chelsea can be much more successful with managers who have at least a decent experience with big teams in Europe. Potter wasn't such manager so it is normal to have doubts about him.
I'm afraid he couldn't prove me wrong about this and his time was a big failure. I think he should go back to managing average teams in the league. I'm not saying this to belittle him of course. I'm saying it because he is much more successful with such teams. We have all seen how good he was with Brighton in the end.
If I am a Football Club owner, I would not think twice to higher Graham Potter. I have always said it that the problem of Chelsea was not GP, that guy was not given enough time to take the club. He did not even go on any preseason and he only managed to do well with Chelsea in the Champions League taking note that the English Premier League was difficult for everyone including the coach of Liverpool. I still believe that Graham Potter will make a good coach. The only person I did not have good hope on is Frank Lampard.
I think you would probably end up with a lot of losses if you were a football club owner. I agree that he wasn't the sole reason why they lost, but he wasn't a manager that turned things around neither, he didn't really provided any positive. Just because someone is not the negative, doesn't mean he was a good thing neither, if things are going bad, then you need a manager to turn the ship around.
Graham Potter could be a manager outside of top 6 and be great there as well, but if you are Chelsea with hundreds of millions of dollars to spend, then you need a world class manager as well, someone with a huge name, and in that case you would do better, GP is not that guy, he is a guy who could take a lower level team higher and utilize it the best, not manager for a great team.