When the continuous growth will flatten what will be the attractivity if not cheaper borderless uncensored usage?
People are already working on that. Maybe not as much as it should, but they do.
Until then, you're required to pay an extra buck. The inherent nature of things should make it clear that achieving universal satisfaction is impossible. It is unrealistic to expect a payment network to be simultaneously free-of-charge, uncensored, decentralized, and immutable, without any drawbacks that I cannot even think of.
Required! Man, this sounds like the bank telling me to pay the 10$ card maintenance or fuck off!
Still haven't told me the major drawback of rising the block size to 4MB or 8 MB.
What element or property of Bitcoin would be in danger and what is the major threat?
There are tradeoffs we deal with. If you prioritize transaction cost, use banks. If you prioritize anonymity, use physical cash. If you prioritize the ability to send money via the Internet, in an censorship resilient and borderless fashion use Bitcoin.
I hope Satoshi is still alive otherwise he would be the first human to die twice, the second from rolling in his grave!
But again, how will 4MB blocks stop Bitcoin from being censorship resilient and borderless?
Prior-version nodes will reject the new blocks, while post-version nodes will continue normally. That is the definition of a hard fork.
We were talking about
backwards compatibility! You're talking about old nodes rejecting new blocks!
Every single new node will still see the old chain as valid, that's backward when the new system can operate with the older one!
[1] Bitcoin Transactions last 24h 428,070
[2] Dogecoin Transactions last 24h 478,009
[3] Ethereum Transactions last 24h 1,063,142
I copy-pasted your numbers so I might have got the ranking messed up

But anyhow, having more transactions in a day is irrelevant to global adoption, right? What matters is the market cap!!! /s