The interview wasn't the first time they publicly revealed their identity. Your allegation of doxxing is merely pointing to a public company registry where they've also disclosed their identities. By that point, Keonne and Hill had already abandoned their pseudonyms. They revealed this in many places, such as UASF groups, but they made a U-turn after people like me and Mandrik who used to work with them started linking their scammer past to their scammer present. Other than establishing evidence of sockpuppetry you can take, for example, the time when they worked at Blockchain info and seeded the Bitcoin wallet from random.org via HTTP, resulting in many of their users losing money: https://nopara73.medium.com/samouraileaks-part-3-is-random-org-random-enough-35704796ae93

This situation is shameful for multiple reasons:

1. I wasn't doxxing, but they seem to believe that if they shout loudly enough, they can make it appear true.
2. Even in a hypothetical universe where I had accessed private information and published it, if that disclosure had helped expose fraudulent conduct, it would have been justified.
3. In fact, since we're on the subject, my parents' address is being disseminated all over the Internet. One can only guess who is responsible for that.

There's one last thing to address though:

If from tomorrow Craig Wright would want you to start calling him SDevS, would you do so and start shaming everyone else who wouldn't?