OP. The way you convey your message sounds too extreme, even though if you examine it more clearly that the direction is not as extreme as you say.
You are right, the OP way of conveying the message of this thread is considered very extreme in conveying the message because he did not explain in advance about cryptocurrency regulations in the country of Indonesia, the other most extreme part is that he forced to link something that was irrelevant like there was a specific intention to convey a negative impact on that country.
The Governor of Bali only said that Indonesia is not anti-crypto, it's just that crypto has not been legalized like El-Salvador or other countries that allow payments using crypto.
The Governor of Bali must carry out the task of explaining to the public and tourists to respect regulations regarding cryptocurrency users as commodity assets because there have been several cases of violations found so the government does not expect this case to happen again. I appreciate the government because the cryptocurrency community is highly valued here and crypto-friendly even though its use must comply with regulations, but we expect new regulations that legalize the use of cryptocurrency for other functions rather than commodity assets.