I don't think everyone has the same definition, opinion or understanding of Bitcoin. Bitcoin for some people, and the way it's designed, is a kind of tool that can weaken and break down political strongholds, not a tool for personal finance like PayPal.
If i'm not mistaken the whitepaper mentions bitcoin as a peer to peer electronic cash .
But how the whole system is actually designed shows that it's not just another network for "peer to peer electronic cash" is it?
And how have you come up to the conclusion that bitcoin can weaken and breakdown political strongholds ? By buying senators like Max Keiser said ? That's what bitcoin has become ? A means to create another caste to rule the world ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Bh3ObPjcFE&t=52sI think that you are the one that have a different definition and understanding of what bitcoin is . Try read the whitepaper to understand why bitcoin was invented .
I'd like you to point me to any post that satoshi makes such a political statement .
Have you truly tried to understand how the protocol works and what its implications are? It's not decentralized PayPal, that I can tell you. It's much much more.
And technically, Bitcoin onchain transactions are not peer to peer. They propagate to the whole network. Lightning transactions, that's peer to peer.