I'm thinking of lowering the standards for what can be included as AI-assisted because both writer.com and writefull.com are extremely lenient compared to hivemoderation.com.
I want to mention this poster because I am 100% that not only is it a bought account but that they are using AI to write posts -- but they are a bit more clever than the other examples because they remove punctuation from their posts, which tricks the detectors. It ends up looking like spam gibberish and nobody will ever read them but they get paid for them anyway.
First of all, nlovric has a registration date of February 03, 2012, yet they wrote this:
Here's an example of a post with the punctuation removed:
It comes back as 32.4% likely to contain AI Generated Text, according to hivemoderation.com.
Here it is with proper punctuation:
This version comes back as 99.1% likely to contain AI Generated Text. However, all the other AI text analyzers suggest it is human-written, with the exception of GPTZero which says it has a "moderate likelihood of being written by AI."
Here's another example where both commas and apostrophes ('s) were removed:
By itself, hivemoderation.com says it is 99.1% likely to contain AI Generated Text.
They are also using ChatGPT to re-write quoted posts, which is maddeningly stupid:
Regarding the department that is on strike, Madrid appears to be exercising greater restraint and carefully weighing their choices. Although many names have been linked to the club in different rumours nothing tangible has been done so far. As the suspense grows supporters and onlookers can only hope that Madrid is sincerely committed to finding a good replacement. Madrid must approach their search with seriousness and attention because the transfer market is a place of uncertainty where rumours and speculation rule.
Clearly AI didn't know that Strikers was in reference to a football position so it re-wrote the text as "department that is on strike," lol.
I want to mention this poster because I am 100% that not only is it a bought account but that they are using AI to write posts -- but they are a bit more clever than the other examples because they remove punctuation from their posts, which tricks the detectors. It ends up looking like spam gibberish and nobody will ever read them but they get paid for them anyway.
First of all, nlovric has a registration date of February 03, 2012, yet they wrote this:
2. When and why did you buy your first bitcoin?
Answer: I bought my first bitcoin in 2019 when bitcoin was around $8,000-$9,000. I bought $1500 to $2,000 worth of bitcoins. I do not remember which exchange I used but I sold it a few months later and I do not remember why
Answer: I bought my first bitcoin in 2019 when bitcoin was around $8,000-$9,000. I bought $1500 to $2,000 worth of bitcoins. I do not remember which exchange I used but I sold it a few months later and I do not remember why
Here's an example of a post with the punctuation removed:
It is crucial to approach the activity with prudence and a focus on risk management when beginning cryptocurrency trading without any prior expertise of technical analysis. Determining entry and exit points for trades becomes difficult without the capacity to analyse charts and indicators. Alternative tactics should be thought of in this circumstance. One strategy might be to focus on fundamental analysis which entails investigating the cryptocurrency underlying project and assessing its prospects for long term success. The likelihood of making winning trades can be increased by choosing cryptocurrencies with solid fundamentals. To reduce the loss of investing in a single dubious cryptocurrency or a shoddy project it would also be wise to diversify your portfolio among several different cryptocurrencies. Finally navigating the volatility and making wise trading decisions can be aided by regularly monitoring the market staying current with news and developments and getting guidance from reliable sources.
Despite the fact that technical analysis is useful in cryptocurrency trading it is not the only strategy available. With proper planning it is possible to handle trade without relying entirely on technical indications.
Despite the fact that technical analysis is useful in cryptocurrency trading it is not the only strategy available. With proper planning it is possible to handle trade without relying entirely on technical indications.
It comes back as 32.4% likely to contain AI Generated Text, according to hivemoderation.com.
Here it is with proper punctuation:
Quote
It is crucial to approach the activity with prudence and a focus on risk management when beginning cryptocurrency trading without any prior expertise of technical analysis. Determining entry and exit points for trades becomes difficult without the capacity to analyse charts and indicators. Alternative tactics should be thought of in this circumstance. One strategy might be to focus on fundamental analysis, which entails investigating the cryptocurrency underlying project and assessing its prospects for long term success. The likelihood of making winning trades can be increased by choosing cryptocurrencies with solid fundamentals. To reduce the loss of investing in a single dubious cryptocurrency, or a shoddy project, it would also be wise to diversify your portfolio among several different cryptocurrencies. Finally, navigating the volatility and making wise trading decisions can be aided by regularly monitoring the market staying current with news and developments, and getting guidance from reliable sources.
Despite the fact that technical analysis is useful in cryptocurrency trading, it is not the only strategy available. With proper planning, it is possible to handle trade without relying entirely on technical indications.
Despite the fact that technical analysis is useful in cryptocurrency trading, it is not the only strategy available. With proper planning, it is possible to handle trade without relying entirely on technical indications.
This version comes back as 99.1% likely to contain AI Generated Text. However, all the other AI text analyzers suggest it is human-written, with the exception of GPTZero which says it has a "moderate likelihood of being written by AI."
Here's another example where both commas and apostrophes ('s) were removed:
Though it is normal to worry about a team future it is crucial to keep in mind that Real Madrid is a team with a long history of success and the potential to draw elite players. There will surely be a vacuum left by Karim Benzema departure but that does not mean the squad will not be able to find replacements who are equally as capable. Real Madrid has an extensive network of scouts and an excellent eye for spotting potential players. Martinez and Osimhen are undoubtedly talented young players with promise but it is important to remember that there are other possibilities on the transfer market. Real Madrid will consider all of their choices before making a choice taking into account a player abilities flexibility and general fit with the team playing philosophy. Have faith in the club leadership and their capacity to decide what is best for the team going forward.
By itself, hivemoderation.com says it is 99.1% likely to contain AI Generated Text.
They are also using ChatGPT to re-write quoted posts, which is maddeningly stupid:
Now Madrid also seems to want to strengthen their defense. Fran Garcia was sent home from Vallecano for just 5 million to match his current left-back performance. Even though in this case there are Alaba and Mendy, but with rumors that there are rumors that they will let Mendy go, it seems they want to be prepared at the start, besides that, the names Cancelo and Davies are also still associated with Madrid.
As for the current Strikers, they still have to wait for what steps they will take. Many names have been rumored with Madrid this time but all are still at the same stage only around rumors and speculation that cannot be confirmed. Hopefully they are really serious about finding a replacement now.
With the recent addition of Fran Garcia from Vallecano for a rumoured sum of only 5 million Madrid commitment on bolstering their defence is clear. Alaba and Mendy are already on the team as left-backs, but rumours of Mendy likely exit suggest the club wants to make sure they have enough backup from the beginning. The expectation surrounding their defensive additions has also been increased by the names Cancelo and Davies being mentioned in connection with a potential transfer to Madrid. As for the current Strikers, they still have to wait for what steps they will take. Many names have been rumored with Madrid this time but all are still at the same stage only around rumors and speculation that cannot be confirmed. Hopefully they are really serious about finding a replacement now.
Regarding the department that is on strike, Madrid appears to be exercising greater restraint and carefully weighing their choices. Although many names have been linked to the club in different rumours nothing tangible has been done so far. As the suspense grows supporters and onlookers can only hope that Madrid is sincerely committed to finding a good replacement. Madrid must approach their search with seriousness and attention because the transfer market is a place of uncertainty where rumours and speculation rule.
Clearly AI didn't know that Strikers was in reference to a football position so it re-wrote the text as "department that is on strike," lol.