Try
https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector. It gives false negative results too and who probably stole the nlovric's acc would also pass it's check with about just 30+% of AI probability. But comparing to other tools I'd say it works good and I haven't ever seen it giving false positive results yet.
OK I'll give it a look next time. I'm thinking that the initial standards I propose need to change b/c they are too rigid... Perhaps it will be something like "any 2 AI detectors that report post text with a strong likelihood of being AI generated" in the future. Ultimately it depends on what the moderators think suffices, and speaking of that, here is the update on the 4 nlovric posts from above that were reported as "AI spam" with a reference link to this thread:
