In the English Premier league we say its competitive because one club cannot win the league for 10 years back to back. But in the French league we say PSG is not a good club that is why they cant win the league 10 straight years. Why cant we also say its a competitive league that's why PSG cant win it that way.
PSG has not lived up to expectation since the takeover, but we cant judge them solely by their failures in the champions league. How long did it take Manchester City, spearheaded by the best coach in the world to win a champions league?
The league can never be worthless, however you look at it.
well, now we try to think about this problem slowly. didn't PSG already have the best players last season like Mbappe, Messi, Neymar but they still failed to get a trophy in the UCL. is this the coach's fault or is it just the players who are less consistent in every match.
I always think about this because PSG is not short of great players but they failed to compete in the champions league while Man City were able to get the UCL trophy after the good contribution of their mainstay player Haaland.
or can we blame the coach who failed to bring PSG success to win the title in the champions league? but it's hard to blame the PSG coach because Galtier is one of the best coaches and has a good experience here.