I don't even know what the weirdest part of this is.
The strange part is that a father refuses his child's gambling winning money when they actually also need the money but there is no clear certainty why a father refuses money that they can use for survival and change their economy.
If the son wouldn't be in control of the money he won how was he able to gamble it in a first place?
Clear the boy not control the winning money if his father refuses the money.
I'm sure the child made the bet because he wanted big things in his life to be able to help and change his family's economy by risking some money with the aim of getting a big win, but after this was actually achieved, his own father refused and did not want to accept the money from gambling a penny.