`
The US has all it takes to host the world cup. They have quality facilities,tight security and good infrastructures, which makes them far better than Qatar. US will spend less because they will only have few things to put in place.
The problem is that the country us already populated and might make them reduce the number of fans that they will grant access to the country for the world cup. One thing I know is that it will be well organized and people will complain less and will feel happy because it has been so many people dreams to be in the US,and I think that the world cup will be a good opportunity.
Undoubtedly, the U.S. with its top-notch infrastructure seems an ideal World Cup host. Yet, aren't the intricacies of such a prestigious gig more than just amenities? Cultural and social facets matter too.
Given our current demographic and immigration policies, could there be a cap on fan inflow? Yet, America's cultural mosaic may promise a one-of-a-kind, inclusive World Cup. And, we've showcased adeptness in managing big-ticket international events.
Still, lets not forget, hosting is not merely about national prestige or a tourist surge. It's a significant investment needing meticulous planning. Could it strain resources and services? Hence, a well-rounded strategy ensuring the pros eclipse the costs and potential hiccups is imperative.