I have yet to see any direct evidence of that.
This is assuming regulations means provisions provided by a government monopoly and not regulations provided without force.
What in fuck's name would a "regulation without force" do or accomplish?
And honestly what the fuck is a "government monopoly", and how do you have no concept of what a
Social Contract is and how it works?
Plenty. People pay for what they desire and neglect what they don't. That to me is very effective regulation. It doesn't bend the world to the pompous whims of the few but it certainly caters to the individual.
Anyways, the social contract is not a valid nor a voluntary contract considering all governments over all associations of people will initiate force against anyone who does not wish to enter into such a contract. I believe man is entitled to interact with his fellow man.