Going further, as a community we should not be selective about which accounts we tag for being previously sold on the basis of some traded accounts might be deemed as positively contributing to the forum. As a community we should be able to achieve some form of consensus about effectively what is the correct course of action in these types of circumstances.
This is so wrong on so many levels. You can't go around treating everyone who fits a certain criteria the same way. We're all individuals, and we all deserve the respect of being treated according to our actions. Some people who purchased accounts long before you registered yours have contributed to this forum in more ways that you could ever hope to. I'm not completely innocent in this regard, look at my recent interactions with newbies in the lending board as prime examples of my own bigotry. But this is bigotry, unequivocally. It's no different than walking down the street and treating everyone of a certain skin color the same way.
Now don't get me wrong, JollyGood; I don't believe you should be on DT and this black and white attitude of yours is a prime example of why I have those beliefs. Life is full of grey areas. If things go the way I expect, the minute you tag a long-standing contributing member for having bought his account years ago, with no DT feedback before the purchase, I think you'll have a hard time convincing people to follow your lead. I also expect that it would lead to tons of drama, and likely cost you some DT1 inclusions.