I also saw this news and I confess that I don't understand this movement by manchester united, knowing that manchester united needs to have a striker who scores a lot of goals, I don't understand why they didn't look for other better options, last season Mason Mount played 24 games in the premier league but he only scored 3 goals and made only 2 assists, this is a very low number of goals for a striker, even if one uses the argument that at chelsea he might not have had chances to score a goal, that would not be a strong justification, because at least that i could see when watching chelsea games

the ball reached the attackers very often, but the problem was really in the attack that wasted goals, I myself had already commented on this in the past that if chelsea wanted to be well, they had to sell all the attackers and buy others and I had already criticized manchester united is always hiring players that won't be of much help to the team and once again they make a mistake in hiring players for their attack. we will see what Mason Mount will do in manchester unite in the next season that will start this August