I am getting lost here, if you are referring to rby.
Poker player, you are a very intelligent and a wise man. The reason I said this is because, even before lovesmayfamilis mentioned my name you already gave a response to the alleged hypothetical statement
How are you going to know that? The only two pieces of information you give are negative, the second less negative than the first, but I don't know if he a scammer or not. Besides, I don't think we're going to see the case you raise because the person who had the account before will have enough red tags and people will have no reason to remove them if they left them in his profile in the first place. If the new owner is "only" a shitposter, do we have to remove the red tags? I don't see it. Besides, if he gets to join a signature campaign it will be 1xbit's. I think the case you make is too hypothetical.
After reading the above, I had to accolade your sense of judgement.
he is not a shitposter.
Thanks for this. But I do not think that this should bother anyone because shitposting is highly subjective. Once I am posting something you do not like, you are free to tag it shitposting even if it does benefit the rest of the community.