Bitcoin is not for alleviating poverty because the path is different for each financial capability possessed by groups of people who use Bitcoin as an investment asset.
With the rapid development of information about Bitcoin all over the world with the knowledge gained from reading about the direction and benefits of Bitcoin, various groups of people can use Bitcoin as a means to convert fiat into Bitcoin in the sense of saving for their hard work while working on a real job.
What does the OP mean to be able to improve their economy financially when someone already knows bitcoin and invests in it? But if it is to alleviate poverty then it is the government not bitcoin.
[snip]
Good. That's the answer that leads to a solution in navigating my version of poverty.
The government is responsible for poverty. I don't know how each country regulates laws or other written regulations related to poverty.
In realizing poverty reduction, the government's role must be seen in the various programs carried out.
That's why I dare to say that Bitcoin is not to reduce poverty, but in terms of its use Bitcoin can be a good solution to increase welfare through long-term investment channels apart from being a good hedge.