~snip~
I don't think you need to explain anything here because the accuser did not provide any evidence for his accusation. You have the right to remain silent until there is evidence to prove you wrong. The explanation you provide will make the accuser find fault with your explanation.
Whether he finds a fault or not, it is already obvious that there is no case that warrants red tag. But then, if a DT member tags someone even without an evidence. The community does not kill the DT member. And it is also lies in the hand of the person who left the tag to remove it. Even if the whole community says that JG and PP should delete the feedback and they refuse, nothing will still happen to them. But then people will begin to distrust them. Another implication of misuse of trust feedback is that you weaken the weight of red tag and promote retaliatory tagging.
I don't support you rby, but what jollygood is doing is wrong, and I have never seen a judgment begin without preliminary evidence
You are not the only one saying it.