Public beef or fights involving billionaires, celebrities, or even top companies often puts them into the spotlight, attracting attention and generating increased traffic, hence, more income. My question arises as to whether you think some or most of these conflicts are genuine or intentionally crafted/orchestrated by the parties involved to maintain their prominence and financial gains.
Also, could this be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy? And If so, is this a good strategy?
It is indeed a strategy to raise insight, controversial and contact so as to make people more interested to pay attention, some media companies sometimes make propaganda problems for the news on the rise and in the spotlight, as well as the actors who are not so well known, then they make Problems with Segaja to attract public attention and his name rose to become a topic of conversation and become a top trending.
Things like that are often used to trigger an increase in public reactions and make it famous, and none other than that is a marketing strategy, and yes the aim is advantage.
But sometimes there are accidental problems, then they use something hype to make a profit.
Good or not a strategy like this is relative to my opinion, depending on the usefulness he took after the problem was resolved.