Re: [ANN] CryptoManager.ai - crypto trading robot - $200 credit for Bitcointalkers
To make this more believable, use a trader's account monitoring service that can display the accounts' profitability over time to the public without you having to screenshot your trading records
Also, screenshots can be manipulated so people barely believe them
Try out icryptofan.com. tradeprofile.net seems to have been down for sometime
Also, screenshots can be manipulated so people barely believe them
Try out icryptofan.com. tradeprofile.net seems to have been down for sometime
Sorry for the long reply and thank you so much for this idea - we will for sure implement this. We do have a demo account with $10.000 starting balance which we launched in 2022 June on Deribit and we can share view API keys with any interested client or a 3rd party service. I tried looking for a 3rd party solution that works, but did not have success with any of these. We want to showcase our Deribit account to add credibility to the track record.
Besides this project, i launched a cryptocurrency exchange in 2015, and did a CRYPTO5 portfolio which did super well investment wise for all our clients, so i have a little bit of verifiable track record besides Crypto Manager, examples here:
https://blog.kaiserex.com/2017/11/02/crypto5-portfolio-performance/
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1744991
https://uzdarbis.lt/t377337/investavimas-i-kriptografines-valiutasbitcoin-ir-kt/
also we already have a few reviews from our current clients who made a nice profit in winter:
https://www.trustpilot.com/review/cryptomanager.ai
Updating the topic with 1 year track record of the plaftorm
So, to summarize, you went from 0.72BTC to 0.717BTC in a year. It reminds me of this experiment with a trading bot. TL;DR: it was a disaster.To make this more believable, use a trader's account monitoring service that can display the accounts' profitability over time to the public without you having to screenshot your trading records
Only future trades should count towards any skills, "the past" can be cherry-picked by showing the best out of many accounts that were in loss. "Brute-forcing" trading results is a known trick to show actual good results, but it doesn't mean it's likely to be reproduced in the future.Well you have some good points that the yearly returns was not ideal
but you are ignoring the market conditions and how much better the system started getting lately. It is pretty damn good not to lose money in a bearish year like we had in 2022, besides that we fixed a few mistakes which increased risk and didn't add additional profitability in good conditions. As for track records, it is a very well known practice to have multiple accounts and only show the winners and this skepticism is a must have in this market and very welcomed. Things change when you have an account with a sizeable amount like we have a demo account on Deribit with $10.000, you can not really afford to be losing on different accounts, because it will cost you way too much. In reality if you are doing less than perfect trading you might lose $50k per year to just have a fake track record with one account holding $10.000.
Last month, Crypto Manager decided not to do any trades and just held the long positions it accumulated in the spring, which resulted in another amazing month with 22.73% profitability.