Please tell me honestly, what's wrong with my feedbacks?
I am open to changing any of my feedbacks and I wanted to open this thread because of what I have had to read about the last one.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=239997
As far as I know, there are two types of cases where DTs disagree.
1. That of the newbies who ask for a loan in the lending section without offering collateral.
2. That of purchased accounts.
So I understand that, although not all DTs have the same opinion, it is legitimate to leave a negative tag for an account that has obviously changed hands.
Well, I had to read this today:
Happy? I find it pretty boring, actually.
This is coming from a person who had the same reaction in this case:
martyins
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1114408
This forum is full of people who break the rules, who buy accounts that make ban evasion, who have alts in the same campaign, of which surely we do not discover even half, and when we discover someone and they are left red tags, as in the case of martyins and this one you have to come out with conspiracies that even you don't believe.
All this when negative feedback means less than ever as we can see nowadays quite a few cases of people with negative feedback participating in paid signature campaigns.
Let this thread serve to question my feedbacks, I will not hesitate to change them if I see weighty arguments or a consensus of DTs to say they are wrong.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=239997
As far as I know, there are two types of cases where DTs disagree.
1. That of the newbies who ask for a loan in the lending section without offering collateral.
2. That of purchased accounts.
So I understand that, although not all DTs have the same opinion, it is legitimate to leave a negative tag for an account that has obviously changed hands.
Well, I had to read this today:
I think you and Poker Player should have a tag team together. Don't validate your nonsense misusing of power by including some others name who are much sensible than you two and respects the system. Clearly others are not as harsh as you. They don't feel happy after tagging someone.
Happy? I find it pretty boring, actually.
This is coming from a person who had the same reaction in this case:
martyins
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1114408
Quote
Ignore all these BS negative and neutral feedback. The account seems changed hand but that does not warrant a scam. There are many accounts who are changed hand and they are doing just fine. This account should not be a different too.
This forum is full of people who break the rules, who buy accounts that make ban evasion, who have alts in the same campaign, of which surely we do not discover even half, and when we discover someone and they are left red tags, as in the case of martyins and this one you have to come out with conspiracies that even you don't believe.
All this when negative feedback means less than ever as we can see nowadays quite a few cases of people with negative feedback participating in paid signature campaigns.
Let this thread serve to question my feedbacks, I will not hesitate to change them if I see weighty arguments or a consensus of DTs to say they are wrong.