As I see it, the trust system is useless if you have to have irrefutable evidence, because by then it will be too late.
There are no rules against that, but obviously you insist on being part of the problem you complain about.
It seems to me that you are unclear about the difference in the weight of evidence to be had between criminal cases and civil cases.
It seems you are unclear about the concept of public perception. If the perception is that a bunch of rouge DT members are handing out red-tags based on their own biases, then the perception is the trust system is fucked.
Go on, keep red-tagging people for stupid shit like
- Having alts
- Shitposting
- Purchased account
The only action on that list that is against forum rules is shitposting, but unless theymos tags you to be a moderator, that's not your job to find and shitposting is not a function of the trust system. If you insist on continuing the way you are, don't be surprised when you see members in signature campaigns despite having been red-tagged by you.