It seems to me that even if Man U remain unchanged next season, their game shouldn't get any worse... As far as I know, the main players are not leaving the club yet... Man U showed good football last season and finished the season in third place... If they don't have any major team changes, they can continue to play well without any new transfers...
So far all I've heard is De Gea leaving. On loan Marcel Sabitzer and Wout Weghorst also returned to Munich and Burnley. Mason Mount's arrival might be an alternative option for Eriksen, Fred and Scott McTominay. It looks like Mount's arrival will be pushed ahead of Casemiro alongside Fernandes, Mc Tominay. In addition, maybe the injury factor makes Ten Hag Hag want to have a lot of creative midfielders.
It seems interesting to look forward to, whether David de Gea will still play next season even though he is playing at a different club. Because it looks like, until now David de Gea is still without a club and thus, I think a club that is willing to bring in David de Gea, maybe it will be the right choice. Indeed, David de Gea is already 32 years old, but that doesn't mean David de Gea is very weak, maybe playing for the next one to two seasons David de Gea can still play well too.
The career path of De Gea is fascinating to examine in the perspective of football economics. An excellent player, no doubt, but at 375,000 pounds a week, clubs have to rethink their spending priorities, right? This is not pretend money like you'd find in a game of Monopoly; it's the actual deal! When it comes to goalkeepers, De Gea's age of 32 is far from obsolete. Ten Hag dismissed him off the team because of his precipitous decrease in performance at MU. Does this mean he will no longer play in Europe? The verdict may be premature at this point. The speculation around his probable transfer to an Asian team like Al-Nassr or the Arab League, though, is difficult to dismiss. Is De Gea's career about to undergo a radical transformation?