Thank you for your post, it's thoughtful and concise.

I was wanting to respond to something you posted in the poker player thread concerning trust feedback where you mention slapping negative feedback on alts.

Unfortunately, PP locked that thread before I could point out that investigators here in this thread have a policy of negative against alts ONLY where there is evidence the alts have scanned e.g. claiming from the same campaign.

I was also going to suggest in that thread you go back and review your legacy posts in the same way I suggested The sceptical cly needs to review their legacy posts - my suggestion to them fell on deaf ears.