Thank you for your post, it's thoughtful and concise.

I was wanting to respond to something you posted in the poker player thread concerning trust feedback where you mention slapping negative feedback on alts.

Unfortunately, Poker Player locked that thread before I could point out that investigators here in this thread have a policy of negative against alts ONLY where there is evidence the alts have scanned e.g. claiming from the same campaign.

I was also going to suggest in that thread you go back and review your legacy posts in the same way I suggested The Sceptical Chymist needs to review their legacy posts - alas, my suggestion to them fell on deaf ears.