Well, I logged off, because sometimes I actually have a lunch, or go out with my wife and child... That's why I have an automated system.

And no, I haven't answered you so far, because I have been thinking what and how should I do. The problem is exactly the same as it was before.

This is an automated system with CLEAR RULES. The moment one makes a transaction that will show up in the list, and I have no intention of hiding ANY transaction, just because some don't bother to look at the rules, or try to make an early wallet (there is no way that you have made your wallet in the right time, and the system shown you 0.02 BTC as minimum, so let's not argue about this).

There is no way either that I can just give that money back. The reason for that is that they are part of the guarantee fund (as the rule says), as any other donation. Now if I pay you back then that amount has to be deducted from the guarantee fund + probably the 200% will be deactivated too. Because it will fall below .30 BTC the guarantee fund (0.42 - 0.18). So you can see how much complications you have made for me. Not to talk about your language used in my thread, which pissed me off just enough a few hours ago to tell, "fu.k it, next time he should learn to read, because if this system is not transparent enough, then nothing is!"

On the other hand, I feel for you. So here's the ONLY think I can AND will do for you: I will make the following PUBLIC APPEAL.

"Guys, there are two persons who have sent some coins to the system (one 0.04 the other 0.18 in many small transactions), who state that they have NOT seen the minimal deposit limit. Now, even if that is not my problem, and the rules are quite clear, I feel for these guys.

Therefor, I ask you that if any of you can make donations do that: those donation will go to the guarantee fund. Once the guarantee fund gets bigger than the maximum of 0.51 BTC, it will stop adding up on the site, and I will use that money to compensate these guys when I close the thread."