May I suggest again that you go back and review your own 344 trust feedbacks, please
I should do that more frequently than I do, I'm would guess there are more than just two examples that need to be addressed. We all evolve through out our journey on this forum.
However, out of the two that you referenced the first one is fresh in my memory and I think it's pretty darn accurate. I don't see any need to revise it, other than maybe reference the thread were he wanted to
sell use as collateral a $250 iPhone for a $500 loan. The second one you referenced I agree it seems rather weak, so yeah I'll take a look at it.
With regards to negatives on alts I can only suggest you look back over the last few pages as the issue came up and each of us has chimed in to remind a newer contributor that having alts does not mean they are out to scam.
Any negative trust feedback on alts has been where there is a solid connection for claiming in a campaign etc.
Feel free to review ALL of my ~350 trust feedback and tell me where they are wrong.
I'll take a look as time permits, and let you know in PM if I think anything need to be reviewed. No need to pour salt on old wounds out in public.