If this is the criterion to determine the quality of a good project then I think it is completely wrong, if I am not mistaken, APTOS also announced that they were hacked on twitter, although this problem is not a bit. In regards to our discussion, but I think social media is just a place of interaction between projects and communities.
If from the beginning, some projects only abuse the media to spread the word about the project, it is also easy to see, they only know how to talk about interactive information without specifying the quality of the product, the ambiguity that the developer himself creates skepticism for users. I also know how easy it is to verify on social media nowadays, maybe just a small fee to deal with, and it really can't be a reason for us to judge the quality of a project. Is that really believable?