I think the part of media contact is mandatory, probably for feedback from the readers and also communication from the media platform. The only parts that may be real are the email, organisation name and website
So you can imagine what confusion this information can cause among readers, especially since it includes correct information about the name of the site and the official email.
The two articles took the information from the same source in the quote I pasted, which is what makes its repetition contribute to proving its credibility.
I was hoping that there would be a clarification of these details so that there would be no confusion, because including a name in this way within an official list of information may not be as clarifying as it causes confusion.
Thank you for the clarification logfiles