Last I checked, he was off DT. He was removed at the beginning of June. If you want to ~ him that's fine, but do you really need to pour more salt into the wound?
Many thanks for the information and I'm already aware of it but it's always helpful to have more people
~ him because quite some members still have him on his trust list.
And no, I don't want to cause any upheaval but
he started to littler my topic in Meta with wrong accusations and my topic over there is not meant for off-topic spam, so I've created this one here in reputation and also included this new topic as reference link.
It's quite sad that he started to littler my topic in Meta with off-topic...

I can't vote in your poll because neither option is applicable, in my opinion. I think he's honest, but not necessarily objective enough to be on DT, and last I checked he is not. And clearly I believe the second option is objectively wrong.
I'm always trying to give someone the benefit of doubt but it's really hard to do this for Timelord2067. The issue here for example is deliberate wrongdoing by Timelord2067, where other DT members explained him his fallacies several times. Still, he didn't even try to listen. Finally,
he locked the topic, not even considering to listen.
Same dishonest strategy how he tried to spread lies against me, that I would have sent him "spam PM's", while he started to PM me twice (June 6 and June 9...)