~~snip~~
Chelsea’s intention is to renew and revive the club from the poor form they suffered last season and in my opinion it is not a hasty decision. If you are a chelsea fan you will know what the club is going through, I watch our matches back to back and i know every player’s performance, most of the players that were sold were so relaxed and played the way they like, they didn’t give their best for the club they play as if nothing was at stake or they are not being paid. If i were the owner i will sell every single one of them and bring in new players (LOL)
Most of those players are not adding anything to the game so what’s the essence of keeping them? If they are not sold players would be too much leading to the club covering for larger wages. The only players i feel should still be in the club are Mount and Kante but Kante’s injuries are getting worse and Mount made a decision to leave the club so it’s best to let them go. There will be a huge boost if chelsea manages to sign Caiceido and surely there will be improvements next season.
While Chelsea choice to offload key players may appear rash it is necessary to take the bigger picture into account. Football clubs frequently base their strategic choices on a variety of elements such as financial concerns team dynamics and long term planning. In spite of the fact that Mason Mount and Kai Havertz were unquestionably important players for Chelsea the team may have had good reasons for letting them leave. Perhaps they believed they could find adequate replacements or saw an opportunity to boost other parts of the team. Giving Pochettino and the new players a fair shot is crucial even though rebuilding Chelsea may take some time and adaptation. Opportunities for up and coming players like Mykhailo Mudryk arise throughout each season and with the right changes and coaching methods Chelsea might continue to prosper under Pochettino direction. Patience and encouragement are essential as they start this new phase.