~snip~
As a regular gambler, I don’t consider wagering requirements to give me trouble when gambling especially when withdrawing my funds since I tend to play all my bankroll as much as possible because I’m playing to get some fun and not to meet the casino wagering requirements. I eventually hit that requirements without knowing once I’m done playing because I always play long hours when gambling since I’m always playing slow to cherish my gaming experience.
Bonuses can be forfeited if you already lose the bonus balance. I don’t think it’s requirements is a big deal on gambling since it’s just an extra credit for playing which you can leave behind if you want to stop already without completing the bonus requirements. The bonus money is just free, We should not cling it as if we own it already so that we can easily let it go.
"Playing for fun" is a phrase thrown around so often in the gambling world. Yet, it's rather perplexing that your "fun" is measured by the number of hours you put into the game, isn't it? While it's true that wagering requirements might not pose as "trouble" for you, they certainly factor into the larger structure of your gaming habits.
Regarding bonuses, your dismissal seems a bit too nonchalant. You say, "The bonus money is just free... we should not cling to it..." Interesting perspective. Yet, isn't it those free bonuses that keep you tethered to the casino, bound in a cycle of continuous play? They're not merely "extra credit", but carefully calculated incentives designed to ensure you stay longer, play more, and thus, spend more.
In the grand scheme of things, isn't the concept of "letting go" fundamentally contradicted by your admission of prolonged hours spent at the casino? Are these not manifestations of an insidious form of attachment?