You are correct in your theory. If lost bitcoins were recovered, it would increase the supply of bitcoins in circulation, which would theoretically lower the price. This is why some people consider lost bitcoins to be a "donation" to the Bitcoin network, as they help to keep the price stable.

However, it is important to note that the impact of lost bitcoins on the price of Bitcoin is not always straightforward. For example, if a large number of lost bitcoins were suddenly recovered, it could cause a short-term price drop as sellers rushed to sell their newfound coins. However, in the long term, the increased supply of bitcoins would likely be offset by the increased demand for bitcoins, as more people become aware of the newfound availability.

Ultimately, the impact of lost bitcoins on the price of Bitcoin is difficult to predict. However, it is clear that lost bitcoins play an important role in the Bitcoin ecosystem, and their recovery could have a significant impact on the price of Bitcoin.

In the past, Bitcointalk has been a vibrant hub for cryptocurrency enthusiasts, developers, and investors alike. It served as a central platform for project announcements, bounty campaigns, and other forms of engagement. The community thrived on the open discussions and opportunities that were shared within its forums.

However, with the emergence of Binance and other launchpads, a shift in user engagement patterns has become apparent. These platforms have attracted significant attention due to their robust token launch mechanisms, attractive investment opportunities, and user-friendly interfaces. As a result, many projects have chosen to launch their tokens through these platforms, overlooking the Bitcointalk forum.

Consequently, the decline in user activity on Bitcointalk can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, users who were primarily interested in project announcements and bounty campaigns may have migrated to launchpads like Binance, where they can access a wider range of projects and investment opportunities. The convenience and streamlined processes offered by launchpads have likely contributed to the decline in Bitcointalk user engagement.

Secondly, prominent projects and services may have shifted their focus away from Bitcointalk as launchpads provide a more effective and efficient means of reaching their target audience. The increased visibility and accessibility offered by launchpads have made them an attractive option for project teams, reducing their reliance on Bitcointalk as a promotional platform.

The potential centralization of Bitcoin is a valid concern, as demonstrated by Binance's influence on the network in 2019 and the growing market share of Foundry in mining. However, it is important to recognize that Bitcoin is still more decentralized than any other form of currency.

Unlike traditional currencies, Bitcoin is not controlled by central servers or authorities. The network is maintained by a distributed network of miners, and anyone can become a miner with the right hardware and software. This means that no single entity or group has control over Bitcoin, which is a significant advantage.

Furthermore, the Bitcoin network is constantly evolving and improving, becoming more decentralized and secure with the development of new technologies. For instance, the Lightning Network enables instant and low-cost transactions, making Bitcoin more accessible for everyday use and reducing the reliance on miners for transaction processing.

I understand your frustration with Binance's KYC requirements. While they can be annoying, they are necessary to comply with regulations in many countries. CZ is certainly one of the most credible faces of crypto, and his reputation would be damaged if Binance were to implode.

It is difficult to say how much harm a Binance implosion would cause Bitcoin. On the one hand, Binance is the largest crypto exchange in the world, so its closure would certainly have a negative impact on the market. On the other hand, Bitcoin is a decentralized currency, and it does not rely on any single exchange for its survival.

The US is a major market for crypto, and its regulators have been increasingly scrutinizing the industry. This has led to some exchanges, such as Binance, being forced to shut down their US operations. However, I do not believe that the US is a major threat to the coin market overall. The US government has a vested interest in the success of the crypto industry, and I believe that it will eventually find a way to regulate it in a way that is both fair and effective.

Overall, I think that a Binance implosion would be a negative development for the crypto market, but it would not be a fatal blow. Bitcoin is a resilient currency, and it would likely survive even if the largest exchange in the world were to fail.