Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Topic OP
Ratimov - prove yourserlf at least the plagiarism accusation
by
BitcoinGirl.Club
on 11/07/2023, 12:10:52 UTC
So, Ratimov, you want some drama again?

You left me a neutral but that does not mean I am not going to speak out. You are still a newborn considering the amount of time I spent in the forum since 2015. I understand this new generation does not respect their elders but that does not mean you will have some unrealistic accusations against me.

As far as I understand the reason of your neutral is the neutral I left on your profile long ago which was below:

Quote
2022-03-19 
Reference 
An absolute merit whore. His famous, "In this article I would like to touch upon such a theme"
Please double check before meriting him.

That was over one and half years ago. If I remember correctly beginning of this year, one of my resolution was to unignore you and continue healthy interaction. But somehow in another thread you were having salty mouth [I am just too lazy to find your salty mouth post]  and indirectly reminding me this neutral feedback as it's like you thought I was going to remove it as a token of my intention of having healthy conversation with you. You indeed was a plagiarist but it was in a unique way. And in my consideration it was plagiarism. Whatever I said there, is still absolutely true.

Let's get back to what you left for me just two days ago [I just noticed it as you are not in my trust list]
Quote
2023-07-06
Reference
Trust abuser. Writes false tags because of his grievances and thirst for revenge. Once I told him not to spread his flood in my topic, and after that he harbored a grudge against me and began to look for any reason to hook me somehow. In essence, a two-faced person who has double standards. What he condemns in others, he gladly does himself. On the forum, he showed himself as someone who does not know how to protect his digital property, so his account was hacked. He is also a plagiarist who managed to escape punishment because no one noticed him.

Trust abuser: I think it's not something I will judge, others will see what I do.

Writes false tags: Even if I did, your reasons were weak. Well, I will leave it to others.

Once I told him not to spread his flood in my topic, and after that he harbored a grudge against me and began to look for any reason to hook me somehow: Is this a personal note for yourself?

two-faced person who has double standards: I will leave it to others. Your heart and mouth is already salty to have a fair opinion.

On the forum, he showed himself as someone who does not know how to protect his digital property, so his account was hacked: LOL, so this is another personal note for yourself. Is this can be even be something to add in a feedback?

a plagiarist: Now, while I have no arguments with you with any of the above accusations you made against me because I understand it's coming from your salty heart, but this claim of me being a plagiarist?
You really need to bring some reference in the next 24 hours. I have a long years with this forum, eight years. If my brain cells are properly storing memories and if I have not lost a little part of the storage then I can not remember, I even ever needed plagiarism. I was not or never needed to be merit whore because I never needed merit to rank up.

If you fail to bring an evidence then know that your mother once was in my bed when I needed someone to suck my dick. She was outstanding in the job and made me so excited that I fucked her hard and made her pregnant. And you are that son of the bitch. What else I can expect when the whore only received $10