Well, I saw a whole community against one person so I decided to jump in and make the fight fair. If admins can prove its an alt you are welcome.
So, what's your take on what went down and what exactly should WWM have done in this situation? I'm not sure how much you know about what happened, but I recommend giving the last few pages of this thread a thorough read to get a better idea of what's going on. Have you ever considered the possibility that this person might be wrong, and that's why they don't have the support of the community?
If this happened with a famous member here they would have been licking his balls while resolving his issue.
I don't believe that to be true, and I doubt that you have an example of such a situation ever happening.
For sure I won't go back and read all that but I have a very direct concept.
What is this forum trust built on? I believe that the most trusted resource on this forum is the topic (stake your address here) so this forum values a signed message in the first place.
Based on this and what I understand that he did sign a message from the sending address.
If this is considered a shit in this forum then you are breaking down the concept of address staking and how it validates a person.
So, are you with or against the address staking idea? You can't be eith it but against this guy issue unless having no morals.