I guess by now he is roaming the forum with his alt.
But nottheless, what do you think would likely happened to account since he wasn't able to defend himself, should it be pama ban or give a tempo ban?
The moderators will not ban the deadsea33 account. He is probably (as you said) roaming the forum with other accounts and is probably doing so for hitting his signature campaign quota.
Maybe the current owner/operator of the deadsea33 account will use this thread to give an explanation.
I thought so too, we haven't seen any response from @deadsea33, after he posted the thread, I thought something was good or bad in responding to his self-made thread against @hugeblack.
But I'm a little doubtful for @deadsea33, responding to this thread, he should have been more free to defend himself in the thread he made himself responding to doubts from @hugeblack acute that it was hacked or bought.
Looks like, if @deadsea33 drops by here, maybe we'll see a long debate in your thread, @JollyGood, with some proof, if he has any.
I doubt he had any proof otherwise he would have presented it by now but it was the fact he gave up easily without trying to defend his actions that stood out. Instead of accepting the neutral tag from hugeblack he decided to try to get a movement behind him to pressure him in to removing the tag but as usual it did not work.
If you notice, it now also has a negative tag. It is with them that JollyGood tries to involve deadsea33 in explaining.
Although those who know JollyGood himself are well aware that no explanation will help to lose the red tag, moreover, in both cases he has no options. Therefore, managers can determine for themselves whether they need an account with a negative tag or not.
I removed the neutral tag and replaced it with a negative tag because the account is clearly no longer in control by the person that created it all those years ago. If he can present an argument to the contrary I will be happy to revise it.