If we compare formally, Arsenal scored a solid 84 points, which, although less than Liverpool's phenomenal (for second place) figures of 90 ++ points, but more than, for example, the number of points that Leicester scored in their championship season. Therefore, I also think that many teams showed a good level in the Premier League, but the fact is that City are in a different league and now it is almost impossible to compete with them.
Now let's imagine if Haaland gets injured who has contributed 36 goals what will happen to Manchester City still reliable? so this is where Manchester City's weakness problems like this can come at any time while Arsenal do not rely on one player they play their respective roles while on the field. I still have hope that Arsenal will be the strongest competitor for Manchester City so we won't see the dominance of just one team.
Haaland's contribution to Manchester City is undoubtedly significant, with a whopping 36 goals under his belt. Yet, let's not forget that the Citizens have topped the EPL and pushed through advanced stages in the Champions League without Haaland. So, if he gets injured, yes, it's a setback. But is it a death knell? I don't think so
Guardiola is known for his adaptability. They've won the hardest matches even without Haaland. So, while Haaland's firepower adds to the team's confidence, his absence won't necessarily herald doom. On the flip side, Arsenal's shared responsibility approach does offer stability. Yet, I believe it's premature to consider them as the toughest competitor for City