I added this account to my watchlist because of this thread
[1], it's starting to get weird how:
- An account awakened from a long period of inactivity distributes merits.
- He has no posts outside this topic.
- Deleted his old posts and there is no bitcoin address for him.
After a while, I noticed his name outside of that topic, I was surprised that he was accepted in a signature campaign run by @Royse777, so I gave him a neutral trust, not a negative one, thinking that @Royse777 knew something about that account, especially since he had zero posts until the date of his acceptance.
@Royse777 Can you confirm that this is the owner of the account or do you have any private information about @deadsea33?
As for the reason that I gave him trust tag and not only keep watching, I explained it here:
While I do agree with the none bolded parts but I really don't like the bold parts especially when a feedback was written as a personal note. Looks like - if you are not sure then why you go openly and start judging someone? You could be wrong and if you are wrong then you are effecting the said person and giving him a bad experience of the forum.
I have two reasons for this:
1) I've been trying to push him to create high quality posts, if he does and after about 2 weeks we'll have a good track posting record from which we can assess whether this account has been hacked or not.
2) He joined a signature campaign, and I was afraid that he would ask for a loan with the guarantee of that campaign payment, and I do not have enough proof, especially with @deadsea33 deleting all his previous addresses/posts.
[1]
deadsea33's "Complete the Word Game and Get Merits"