<snip obvious and already discussed crap>
But nottheless, what do you think would likely happened to account since he wasn't able to defend himself, should it be pama ban or give a tempo ban?
Note the above post is a stereotypical sig campaign shitpost. You've been a member here since 12/2021 and you don't realize that neither of those things is going to happen unless the account in question is evading a ban already?
I'm trying to be as polite as I can and am resisting the urge to say
GTFO, though I very much want to.
[...]
Allow me to complete that post you quoted and pointed out another thing regarding address signing, as below:
I think If I am not mistakenly I have came across the thread and also posted as well, from my observation I understand that the account is a bought account because there are two things possible; 1. Either he come and defend himself or herself or 2. He should have signed a message using a wallet that was used in a campaign for the last 3 years or last 2 years reason I said that is there may be some cases where he Lost all access to the first address association to the account due to lack of understanding or not knowing how to safely secure his wallet details. This may be considered but haven not come to explain and show proof as the original owner has disqualified him of being the first holder of that account.
[...]
If you came across the thread [which you did] and read them before posting either there or here, you'll also have a knowledge that your second proposal is impossible. I posted on that thread that he doesn't have any address on record and that
JeromeTash had to go to unconventional way to dug their old address, and that's from waayy past the timeframe you suggested, three years due to that excuse [read above, the complete reason is well quoted]
That'll probably be a bit problematic, I
can't find OP posted any address in the past other than
the one he made this week enrolling on several campaigns and seems completely new.
[...]
[...]
Then i guess he shouldn't have a problem signing a message from any of the following donation bitcoin addresses that appeared on his profile at one point as per the archives
Donations for iXcoin development: BTC: 17ckvmvSt8SPEy2DnjtGVpY8p5KK5B9f3c
Donations for iXcoin development: BTC: 1BdftzcoqrR6sAHRMTZoFcUnDvJDRgcZBP
[...]
Signing a wallet that fits your criteria [used in a campaign in the last 2-3 years] will be a walk in a park as that wallet will be the one he created just earlier this month and surely is in his possession, and it proves nothing, no ties of the ownership with whoever hold the account prior to it waking up.