OP, Maybe the title is a bit excessive. They introduced some restrictions for certain countries and announced a possible request for KYC information in case they suspect an attempt to circumvent this rule. So for a large number of users, it is still a no-KYC casino.
Plus it is clarified here that:
Do you know any player at Freebitcoin who was asked to perform KYC verification?
They have implemented the new terms in this month. Probably Freebitco team hasn't applied the identity verification rules to anyone yet. But they might do it in the near future.
It was about weeks ago. No we haven't and I very much doubt we ever will.
However, it's just fair to remove FreeBitco.in from the no-KYC category considering that it is clearly stipulated in their updated ToS that it has the right to verify your identity. Having an account there means you agree to it. So, despite a team member expressing doubt that KYC will ever be implemented to anybody, it isn't the agreement that gamblers agree on. It's not an assurance or a guarantee.
Anyway, to TheQuin, since you're not pushed by any agency to include KYC in your ToS or required by Costa Rica to implement it, why did you include it? Is it not possible to draft a more professional ToS without including KYC?