and here again you are posting false accusations

if you quote my README.txt you should also quote this:


It was hard to developed this tool, so i have to make sure i get my share by verifying the key otherwise the user could just use the key and run - you see the problem?

It's all about trust... you don't trust me, but i should  trust the users? we are talking about a big reward!

Of course the user has to trust me that i do not take the money and run - that's right, but think about this:
would this be wise from my point of view? NO we have #67 and more to come, so i am very interested that whoever finds the key gets his share and helps to find the next key and i get again 50% of the reward.
If i would take the money and run i could only do it once... this would be very stupid.

I can only repeat:
internet permission is not required - the key is just saved to a text file.  (the TLS stuff comes from the linked libgmpxx.a which was build by compiling libgmp.a, so i linked it)

As we are talking about trust and false warnings:
why don't you warn people using the pool that is advertised here? it also includes precompiled executeables for windows and linux and unlike my tool the keys and ranges are send to a server... so to all you guys contributing to the pool: you have to trust the guy who runs the server (also a newbie), but unlike i don't say that you cannot trust him an he will run once a key is found, but it's the same problem, so it quite strange that you talk only about my tool and not about the pool.

So i repeat: My tool does what i advertised (the chance to find a is afaik higher than with any other CPU tool i have tested) and i will not run, if a key is found.

If you don't trust me or don't want to share the reward 50:50 then simply don't use my tool, but in this case you should also not use any pools and you should always only use open source tools you compiled yourself!