This is my last reply regarding useless speed comparisions:
you simply have to compare the speed of my tool with your prefered tool on your own!!!
MY TOOL IS FOR CPU *NOT* FOR GPU - GPUs ARE FASTER - I KNOW IT - EVERYBODY KNOWS IT!
i just gave you a number for my very slow CPU and only on one core and this is a mobile CPU! This does not say anything about keyrates on your CPU!
if your prefered tool is faster, then use it and be happy with it! On my CPU my tool is faster - is this so hard to understand?
you are talking about an increased chance of searching - how is this statement justified?
only through tests...
i run competiton tests between my tool and other CPU tools and my tool always found the key faster, so i guess my search logic works somehow better than a simple random search, but you cannot exspect miracles like a 10x speed improvement.
I downloaded them this morning and ran them through the online scanner and they were all clean. Ran the generic on wsl and it worked 1 thread as about 2 m/secomnd it seems to make a file that is eeither a checkpoint or remembers the addresses tried or both. works well but since I paid for a rtx GPU and made a control program so it runs unattended I am going to use that but for CPU users it should be great