Look at this result. It's frustrating
I will show you how the AI tool works. Compare my post with the post that was actually written by the AI.
When a person writes, he rarely has an ideal formulation of the text.
And in the case of using AI tools, Watery practically does not exist.
I can't say that this is an exact determinant, but in most cases, it is.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5460817.msg62592447#msg62592447
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg62557026#msg62557026
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg62487062#msg62487062
And yes. I also checked my text and saw the results. I think this is also influenced by the fact that I used popular AI expressions.
There was only one statement in this thread from a user saying that the allegations were not correct. But even so, Nutildah added further evidence.
However, even knowing that Copyleaks can falsely work, you can look at the user's early posts and see if all the other posts were as good as the ones that are suspected of using an AI tool.
As you can see, there were no false positives in this thread, and the moderators successfully removed all posts that were reported.
There was only one statement in this thread from a user saying that the allegations were not correct. But even so, Nutildah added further evidence.
Even knowing that Copyleaks can falsely work, you can look at the user's early posts and see if all the other posts were as good as the ones that are suspected of using an AI tool.
There were no false positives in this thread, and the moderators successfully removed all posts that were reported.
Copyleaks 99,9%