He changed to *provably fair. server/client/nonce*. Thats why i said scam. No one believes in this provably fair
You still repeat this despite not adding sensible details to back your claim. I don't know how you prioritise your careful use of words, I guess it goes a long way as some careless declaration could be so insensitive. Has he even launched the site to ascertain whether he's right or wrong with the provably fair remarks?
This is a business, the least you can do to support a startup is to be fair.