Not good idea. Send many is very useful and needed. You are sounding more and more like RealScam with these demonic measures and frequent client updates ( remember SC beta 5 then 6 then 7 all in like 1 hour ? ). Let the miners decide if the chain is bloated and the TX fees. Maybe coblee is RS 
. Kind of makes sense : you control the biggest competitor to SC and get all the market for altcoins by yourself.
. Kind of makes sense : you control the biggest competitor to SC and get all the market for altcoins by yourself. for whom is it useful to send one amount to many addresses at once?
i give u a little hint: spammers...
Great idea of coblee
the fee for an output greater then 2 = 0.1 LTC/each transaction
in my opinion it should be higher for greater outputs:
for an output greater then 10 = 1 LTC/each transaction
Sigh ... knee-jerk reactions don't solve problems (as we have already seen ...)
Although no one already does, you would hope that people (e.g. pools) would actually make single transaction payments rather than multiple 2 output transactions.
This change is just saying that people should only use a standard 2 output txn for everything they do and not promoting optimum use of transactions at all.
Since your both just picking random numbers and not thinking about them or asking for input on them, then pick 2 much larger random numbers.
It would be WAY worse if the person doing this decided to put every single output pair into it's own transaction ...