if you must take any bonus it should be a the with the lowest wager requirements, let say anything above 1x is already a big red flag to avoid if not you may lose your deposits including winning trying to meet a high wager requirement on bonuses.
Although this topic is not about wagering requirement on bonuses but your statement makes me interested to reply.
Anything above 1x is already a red flag for wagering requirement on bonuses? I have no idea how can you say like this while there is no single deposit bonus that comes with lower than 30x wagering requirement.
I'm wondering what do you know about wagering requirement on bonuses in this gambling industry that might be something other's do not know including me.
Would you share which casinos offer deposit bonuses with low wagering requirement (under 1x) to make it a green flag?
No mate I don't know of any casino that offers such a low wagering requirement that is below 1x and most time I play on stake.com and a couple of times that I make deposits into my account, I was not given any bonus and that is ok by me since I ain't be subject to any wagering requirement before I withdraw, and also I have made a lot of winning and withdrawal without any issues.
This makes me to be more at home without bonuses since bonus hunting will always bring about wagering requirements, but then at that, we have to consider other gamblers who go about chasing the bonuses and this is included in the entire number of active gamblers and must be included in this discussions.
So that is what brought about the mentioning of the casino with low wagering requirements and those that don't have such high wager requirements, but due to anti-money laundering policies, every deposit require at least 1x wagering, but not all casino have such MLA and some have a higher wager requirement.