so concentrate on debates about bringing the cost of using bitcoin down becasue the cost of storing bitcoin is not unmanageable
It goes hand in hand though: if Bitcoin blocks would be an order of magnitude larger, transactions would be cheap for a while, but the required storage would grow much faster.
if the byte miscounting cludge and the dismissal of the segregation separation were to be removed and everything went to a lean legacy tx format of utilising the SAME 4mb space per block allowed today.. the storage would grow at the same rate as today.. not faster. and the amount of tx count per day would grow meaning the cost per transaction would come down
along with a better fee formulation than the current: legacy *4. and instead have utxo age <70= *100 would penalise spammers more meaning less spammers and only penalise spammers for premium fees. would reduce fees even more and make more room for genuine transactions to take priority thus allowing more people to get priority sooner rather being treated as second class users. thus make people want to be active and help support the network and want to run nodes more regularly