To this day I wonder whether he decided to edit the Wikipedia page by his own or he was instructed to do so by other people in a higher position. Because to me, it does not sound normal some participant of a signature campaign would be willing to go out their way to defend the casino they promote, in such specific way.
I think they promised him some extra incentive or something if he finished that task successfully since I don't think he was a devoted follower of 1xbit based on what I observed though I could be wrong.
Anyways, I knew he got banned, which is quite rare considering the policies of this forum and they way so many scammers are left to roam around.
As I mentioned in my previous post, he got banned by breaking one or more forum rules(Not because he advertised 1xbit).
It still sounds weird to me a casino which already has a bad reputation decided to pay for something which could not help their reputation at any meaningful way and even giving the task to someone else, when editing a Wiki page is something anyone can do with an account (assuming the page does not have any kind of protection, though).
I was aware they cannot be banned for promoting anything, by the way.
This may be one of the most opened forums when comes to freedom of speech.
It's hard to see the perspective of 1xbit marketing team as they are obviously doing the opposite. They are trying to improve their reputation in this forum despite that everyone knows that they are totally a scam casino. It would be easier to just rebrand and focus on doing legit things rather than spending their money on worthless advertisement. A negative publicity isn't as effective as on other industry where negative publicity is still publicity.