@OP wall test with no bold test or lines are kinda hard to read
I wasn't planning on checking out because of the layout
But I'm glad I did
I have come across views on how game theory was applied by satoshi
It was really fun but not absolute
From a game theory perspective, Satoshi Nakamoto also devised a version of the "Game"
makes it seem like
It has been proven that satoshi devised a version.
As it's already been seen
Satoshi was a good economist
So he would have applied different model including the game theory while creating Bitcoin.
About the 2.625BTC am curious where the 8M came from
My choice for the number of coins and distribution schedule was an educated guess. It was a difficult choice, because once the network is going it’s locked in and we’re stuck with it. I wanted to pick something that would make prices similar to existing currencies, but without knowing the future, that’s very hard. I ended up picking something in the middle. If Bitcoin remains a small niche, it’ll be worth less per unit than existing currencies. If you imagine it being used for some fraction of world commerce, then there’s only going to be 21 million coins for the whole world, so it would be worth much more per unit. Values are 64-bit integers with 8 decimal places, so 1 coin is represented internally as 100000000. There’s plenty of granularity if typical prices become small. For example, if 0.001 is worth 1 Euro, then it might be easier to change where the decimal point is displayed, so if you had 1 Bitcoin it’s now displayed as 1000, and 0.001 is displayed as 1.
from the supposed email reply of satoshi to Hearn.
There are other theories but I'm not stressing myself over it
So sticking with an educated guess.