Hate to say it, but franky's right about your math. You don't think of a figure and then look for a way to arrive at it (thinking myself now of how people seem obsessed with 21m and then look for a way to arrive at that, as if that was ever the predetermined destination).
Correlation is not causation, try as hard as I may, I find no need or even economic interest in a Bitcoin holy scripture.
2.625, if you suggest, can also hardly be the universal sum. A Papua New Guinean holder and a Swiss holder surely shouldn't hold the same "optimal" sum?
Op, did you use AI to write this? I didn't even read what you wrote. But the content doesn't seem original. Different Ai content detectors detect your content as AI writes. I DON'T WANT TO BLAME YOU since I haven't seen you using AI before to write content. Only you know better if you have used any kind of tools to write this or not. If you did, you would get caught eventually and then boom!
If you did not use AI, thank you very much, and I am sorry to bother you. But, if you did. Take this as friendly advice and never use AI to write content to post in BitcoinTalk.
If he did use AI, it was only to help his layout, OP's at least his own author bringing something new to Bitcoin discussion (IMO). Posts like yours, on the other hand...