I didn't do it, although majority votes yes. So I'm not sure what's your point here. I wanted to see where my investors at. Why don't yyou post my response to this voting? Huh?
I pointed out so many things and that's the only one you choose to answer? Deflecting again, aren't you? But sure, I'll level with you, let's focus on that poll first, and I hope on your next reply you'll address all of those matters I raised here. After all, it's arguably a nice point of DD to anyone interested on your project. They deserves to know those details, and get answers about it instead of the perpetual evasiveness.
Moving on, to what you asked me. What's my point? I believe I've made it quite clear,
I thought that wallet is exclusively for gold to give your investor a sense of security? You have your marketing wallet for it, so why even considering to take from a wallet that's specifically designated as the foundation of your project? One may argue that it's a sign that you're quite easy to be swayed, don't you agree?
Did you get it now?
Your answer, though, is extremely interesting. I understand you make a poll, wanted to see your investors opinion [which, a good thing, to listen to your community, the point being raised aside as it's rather controversial], and then the majority voted yes and you still go against it? Against the majority vote of your community? Doesn't it imply that the ultimate decision lies in your hand? A centralized system? One that you're pretty much swore against?